You may have heard about the legislation for a compulsory ID card progressing through the House of Commons. It's easy to think, "It's just another piece of plastic, like a driving licence." This assumption, however, dangerously underestimates the profound threat this scheme poses to our privacy and autonomy.

The proposed ID card is not the main event. It is merely the key to a much larger and more invasive system: the National Identity Register (NIR). This centralised database is designed to hold an unprecedented amount of your personal information, creating a lifelong, government-controlled log of your existence.

What Exactly is the National Identity Register (NIR)?

The NIR is the heart of the scheme, and it goes far beyond storing your name and address. The information it is mandated to hold includes:

• A unique, government-issued identity number for every citizen.
• Your fingerprints.
• An iris scan (a biometric scan of the back of your eye).
• Your photograph.

But that's just the beginning. The database has provisions for countless other personal details, including your religion, residence status, and more. Critically, the government can expand the categories of information stored without needing further approval from Parliament.

Real-Time Tracking: The End of Anonymous Life

This is where the scheme transitions from a simple ID card to a pervasive surveillance tool. The card will be used to check your identity against the NIR in real time.

Imagine this scenario: Every bank, post office, pharmacy, and even shop selling alcohol will have an NIR card terminal. Each time you swipe your card to prove your age or identity, a record of the time and location is logged in the central database.

This means the government could have a record of:

• Every time you withdraw over a certain amount from your bank.
• Every prescription medication you collect.
• Every time you purchase alcohol.

Your Life, Consolidated Under One Number

Perhaps the most alarming aspect is the planned integration with private corporations. To apply for a job, get an Oyster card, obtain a driving licence, or even sign up for a mobile phone contract, you will be forced to swipe your ID card.

Companies like BT, DVLA, and Nectar will be allowed to link your unique NIR number to their own detailed databases. This consolidates your travel history, phone records, driving habits, and even your shopping preferences under a single, government-issued identifier.

These rich datasets, small enough to fit on a handheld device, could then be sold—legally or illegally—to third parties. The result? Any corporation or malicious actor could build a comprehensive dossier on your life, all accessible via your NIR number.

Compulsion and Control: You Have No Choice

The government is making this scheme mandatory through a powerful form of coercion. If you or your children wish to obtain or renew a passport, you will be forced to submit your fingerprints and iris scans for the NIR. Refusal means you will be denied a passport.

Furthermore, the ID card itself will not be your property. The Home Secretary reserves the right to revoke or suspend your identity at any time. If this happens, you could be locked out of your bank account and unable to perform any task that requires official ID.

Debunking the Government's Justifications

The arguments for this intrusive system are weak and easily disproven:

• It will not stop terrorism. The Madrid bombers in 2004 all possessed Spain's compulsory ID cards.
• An ID card will not eliminate benefit fraud. The cost of this scheme, estimated by the London School of Economics to be in the billions, vastly outweighs the relatively minor losses from benefit fraud.

The True Cost: Your Freedom

This scheme is not about security or efficiency. It is a mechanism for total surveillance and control over the ordinary British citizen. It represents a fundamental shift in the relationship between the individual and the state, sacrificing our privacy and freedom for the profit of the companies building the system and the convenience of government oversight.

What Can You Do?

If this has unsettled you, you are not alone. The bill has progressed this far due to a lack of public awareness about its true scope.

Your voice matters. Share this information with your friends, family, and colleagues. Contact your MP and demand they oppose the National Identity Register. An informed public is the strongest defence against the erosion of our fundamental liberties.

Together, we can ensure the nation understands the true stakes of this proposal.

If you require assistance with this article, contact us

Primary Source

• Author: Frances Stonor Saunders, a respected historian and writer. Her credentials, as mentioned in the text, lend her credibility, but this piece is structured as an opinion and warning.
• Context: The text was written and circulated around 2004-2005, as the Labour government's Identity Cards Bill was being debated in Parliament. It was part of a widespread public and political campaign against the bill.

Factual Foundations (Supported by Government Documents and Independent Analysis)

1. The National Identity Register (NIR):
   • Source: The UK Government's Identity Cards Act 2006. The Act itself established the legal framework for the NIR.
   • Verification: The government's own explanatory notes and the bill's text detailed the information to be held on the register, including personal details, biometrics (fingerprints, facial image, iris scan), and a unique National Identity Registration Number (Clause 1, Schedule 1 of the Act).
2. Compulsion via Passport:
   • Source: Identity Cards Act 2006. The Act made it a condition that anyone applying for a passport (from a date to be specified) would be automatically entered into the NIR and issued an ID card. This was the mechanism for making the scheme "effectively compulsory."
   • Verification: This was a central and highly controversial part of the government's plan, explicitly stated in the legislation.
3. Card Not Your Property / Revocation Power:
   • Source: Identity Cards Act 2006. The Act granted the Secretary of State the power to revoke or require the surrender of an ID card (Sections 12-13). The card remained property of the Secretary of State.
4. Cost and Benefit Fraud Critique:
   • Source: The London School of Economics (LSE) published a highly influential report in 2005 titled "The Identity Project: An assessment of the UK Identity Cards Bill and its implications".
   • Verification: The LSE report estimated the costs could rise to £10-£19 billion, far exceeding government estimates, and critically assessed the claims about preventing terrorism and fraud. This report was a cornerstone of the opposition's arguments.
5. Madrid Bombers Example:
   • Source: Widespread news reporting and analysis. The 2004 Madrid train bombers did indeed possess Spanish national ID cards (DNI), which were used to illustrate that compulsory ID does not prevent terrorist attacks.

Author's Interpretation and Predictions (Not Fully Realized)

Many of the more dystopian predictions in the text were speculative projections of how the system could be used, based on the proposed architecture. They were not all enacted before the scheme was scrapped.

• Universal Swiping & Private Sector Access: The text predicts mandatory card terminals in banks, post offices, and shops, with private companies like BT and Nectar having access to the NIR.
  • Reality: The 2006 Act did include provisions for "verifying information" with consent (Section 12-14), opening the door for private sector use. However, the widespread, mandatory use predicted in every shop and for every transaction was not legally mandated and remained a fear about future "function creep."
• The "Handheld Database": The idea of detailed dossiers being sold was a warning about the potential for data misuse and the creation of a "surveillance society," a common concern among privacy advocates like Privacy International and NO2ID (the main campaign group against the scheme).

Historical Outcome: The Scheme Was Scrapped

It is vital to note that the Identity Cards Act 2006 was repealed by the Coalition Government (Conservative-Liberal Democrat) in 2010 via the Identity Documents Act. The National Identity Register was destroyed, and the ID cards that had been issued became invalid.

In summary, the source is a 2005-era advocacy piece. Its factual claims about the proposed system's design and legal powers are sourced from the government's own 2006 Act and contemporary critiques like the LSE report. Its more alarming predictions about universal tracking were speculative interpretations of the system's potential, which were never fully realized because the scheme was ultimately abolished.

Please see our disclaimer